[一八] Alexander Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch，同前注一0，pp. 一六-一七.
[一九] 参见John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust, 同前注一一，p. 七一。
[二0] James Thayer, “The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law”, 七 Harvard Law Review 一二九 (一八九三).
[二一] “Letter to Harold Laski, March 四, 一九二0”, in Mark Howe,ed., Holmes-Laski Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Harold Laski 一九一六-一九三五, Harvard University Press, p. 二四九.
[二二] 关于反多数难题在美国宪法理论中的地位，可参见Barry Friedman, “The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five,” 一一二 Yale Law Journal 一五三 (二00二)。
[二三] 毕克尔晚年有保守化的转向，人民不然而虚化的，而且是危险的暴民，参见Alexander Bickel, The Morality of Consent, Yale University Press, 一九七七.
[二四] Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Foundations, 同前注四，pp. 六-七.
[二五] “在因为此种或者彼种原由，整个公民不可能实际出现并亲身介进立法进程的情景中，代议制民主很多是再显著不外的政府体系体例。”参见John Ely，同前注一一，p.七七。
[二六] Edmund Morgan, “The Fiction of ‘The People’”, in New York Review of Books, April 二三, 一九九二, p.四八.
[二七] Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Foundations, 同前注四，p.六.
[二八] Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Foundations, 同前注四，p.七.
[二九] Charles Beard, An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States, MacMillan, 一九一三.
[三0] 关于《联邦党人文集》第一0篇的“知识考古学”，参见Douglass Adair, “The Tenth Federalist Revisited”, in Douglass Adair, Fame and the Founding Fathers, Liberty Fund, 一九九八, pp.一0六-一三一。
[三一] 参见The Federalist, Harvard University Press, 二00九, p. 六九.
[三二] 关于比尔德命题及其反证的1个文集，可参见Leonard Levy, ed., Essays on the Making of the Constitution, Oxford University Press, 一九六九.
[三三] Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Foundations, 同前注四，p.一六五.
[三四] Id.，p.二0六.
[三五] 关于阿克曼对于于“不断革命”与“革命忘怀症”的阐述，参见Id.，pp. 一六九-七一。
[三六] John Ferling, Almost a Miracle: The American Victory in the War of Independence, Oxford University Press, 二00七.
[三七] Bruce Ackerman, The Future of Liberal Revolution, Yale University Press, 一九九二, p.五0.
[三八] Bruce Ackerman, The Failure of the Founding Fathers, 同前注七，pp. 一六-七.
[三九] Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Foundations, 同前注四，p. 二0六. 阿克曼的革命理论在很大程度上来自于阿伦特的《论革命》。“令人悲伤的事其实于，灾难性的法国大革命塑造了世界历史，而如此成功胜利的美国革命却依然不外是仅拥有处所性意义的事件。”参见Hannah Arendt, On Revolution, Viking, 一九六三, p. 五六.
百度搜索“70edu”或“70教育网”即可找到本站免费阅读全部范文。收藏本站方便下次阅读，70教育网，提供经典法学类从新理解美国宪法(13)在线全文阅读。
